Three Precepts on Computer Use
1. Three precepts on computer use:
“Thou shall not use a computer to steal.” –Stealing is almost universally accepted as unethical and illegal, whether reflected in Divine Law or Moral Law. As such, this particular precept should be adhered to.
“Thou shall not use a computer to harm other people.” – I chose this specific precept to discuss in this assignment as I am very concerned with the potential harm dangerous and pornographic materials in the internet can do to minors and the weak. Above all else, this evil must be avoided and steps taken to ensure that it will not pervade computing. Otherwise, a Pandora’s box of untold harm will be opened. Given that not all people believe in God or in His sovereignty over man’s actions, and therefore may not subscribe to Divine Law, at least, there should be some sort of adherence to Moral Law – or observance of acceptable and ethical behavior in a given community, in this case, the computing community. I can personally say that with this particular concern of not allowing the internet to be used by individuals to corrupt minors, or abuse women, I will subscribe to ethical absolutism. There should be no “ifs” and “buts”. Materials of this nature should be banned in the internet, or at least be open to pre-determined members only. The technical aspect of how to do this may be vague to me but I will still would want to think that it can be done.
“Thou shall think about the social consequences of the program you write.” - This one is closely related to the preceding concern I have written, except that this is more specific to computer program one writes. The computer is not just like any other tool to do good or harm as its potential is exponentially increased in scope and magnitude. Computers are used by both the good and bad elements of society and this should all the more give reason for programmers to see to it that their works have positive influence and that these will redound to common good. I believe that it is one’s moral obligation to use his talents and gifts to multiply goodness. As I mentioned in one of my postings, acting ethically is self-preserving as eventually, the society where one belongs to will survive if everybody does his share to preserve it. For this particular precept, ethical altruism is very evident. And I believe that it is indeed altruism to use one’s abilities to spread good rather than harm. Think about the people needing the aid of modern technology and computers, and allowing them to realize this need through your own programs! Think about the difference that you can make, the lives you can touch and the goodwill you can spread. This is what I am talking about when I say that whatever is done in the computer increases exponentially – whether positive or negative.
2. Yes I do. I believe that it will ultimately be for the good of everybody in the computing community if there is legislation governing computer use.
This will signal a formal recognition by government of its responsibilities to include computing as an area where its police power, regulatory power and even power of imminent domain should be enforced. It will also ensure that the computing community has the right to require government to include in its plans, policies and programs computing concerns like better telecommunications infrastructure facilities, decency in the web and better access of the majority to IT education, which ensure a steady supply of IT people.
Moreover, legislation will also ensure that my rights as a person will be respected, and if ever violated, I will have the resort to counter legally.





